Blanchard, Bailey, Zucker and Cantor, the 4 "sexologist" promoters of "normalcy" for cross-dressing men, all operated on the assumption that their goal was to make the wives stay in the marriages and prove this was "just a variation" in sexual practices. They did not come clean about the freakish fantasies of their subjects, who typicall…
Blanchard, Bailey, Zucker and Cantor, the 4 "sexologist" promoters of "normalcy" for cross-dressing men, all operated on the assumption that their goal was to make the wives stay in the marriages and prove this was "just a variation" in sexual practices. They did not come clean about the freakish fantasies of their subjects, who typically were middle-aged family men, fathers of children. They coerced and pressured the wives, women like me, to "try it out." In a 2002 Atlantic Monthly article (now scrubbed from its archives, but preserved at childrenoftransition.org) Blanchard says, (oh so casually) "They have a disconnect between reality and their fantasy. It's too disruptive to acknowledge that you wish your penis was part of your wife's body and not yours. It's too disruptive to acknowledge that this is a sexual compulsion." Then the 4 Musketeers of Sex went on to formulate several different categories of this fetish, while not calling it a fetish, "homosexual transsexual, transvestite, autogynophile," &etc, making money with books having titles like "The Man Who Would Be Queen." The Judith Butlers of the world decided to add their own spin with their own incomprehensible "gender studies" books, which oddly promote sex stereotypes. I have no problem with leaving the Left, which I grew up in during my Madison Wisconsin childhood. In the 1970s political meetings, the Leftist men would send out "the girls" for sandwiches and more beer. They are walking on a sea of their own petards, like mystics tiptoeing over the bed of coals. For the real deal, from an ex escort:
Blanchard, Bailey, Zucker and Cantor, the 4 "sexologist" promoters of "normalcy" for cross-dressing men, all operated on the assumption that their goal was to make the wives stay in the marriages and prove this was "just a variation" in sexual practices. They did not come clean about the freakish fantasies of their subjects, who typically were middle-aged family men, fathers of children. They coerced and pressured the wives, women like me, to "try it out." In a 2002 Atlantic Monthly article (now scrubbed from its archives, but preserved at childrenoftransition.org) Blanchard says, (oh so casually) "They have a disconnect between reality and their fantasy. It's too disruptive to acknowledge that you wish your penis was part of your wife's body and not yours. It's too disruptive to acknowledge that this is a sexual compulsion." Then the 4 Musketeers of Sex went on to formulate several different categories of this fetish, while not calling it a fetish, "homosexual transsexual, transvestite, autogynophile," &etc, making money with books having titles like "The Man Who Would Be Queen." The Judith Butlers of the world decided to add their own spin with their own incomprehensible "gender studies" books, which oddly promote sex stereotypes. I have no problem with leaving the Left, which I grew up in during my Madison Wisconsin childhood. In the 1970s political meetings, the Leftist men would send out "the girls" for sandwiches and more beer. They are walking on a sea of their own petards, like mystics tiptoeing over the bed of coals. For the real deal, from an ex escort:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB_Htt42Xeo&t=9s