20 Comments

We are starting to see a wave of deaths from the iatrogenic harms of wrong sex hormones and sex trait modification surgeries on the urinary tract. No one is keeping the records, it appears, except me and Exulansic (exulansic.substack.com) in a project we're calling The Dead Names List.

Here are a few:

1. Griffin Sivret, natal female, 24, sepsis, 2. Liam Johns, natal female, 35, liver failure, 3. Yarden Seveira, natal male, 24, sepsis initially then suicide, 4. Davina Anne Gabriel, natal male, 62, suicide after detransition with expressed complete regret, 5. Name Unknown, natal male, 62, liver & gall bladder cancer, listed in Mayo Clinic study, 6. Name Unknown, natal male, 18, sepsis, immediately after "vaginoplasty" as listed in the Dutch Study of 2014

The likes of Mark/Marci Bowers, Olson-Kennedy and Richard/Rachel Levine are sitting on many more statistics of deaths from cardiac disease, liver cancer, pulmonary thrombosis, sepsis after surgery fails and suicides when these iatrogenic, terminal illnesses are diagnosed. This will be the largest medical malpractice scandal in history, says child psychiatrist, Dr. Miriam Grossman.

Now, my analysis of Ro Khanna acting like the above doesn't exist when Megyn Kelly challenges:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oy6GkjGxA_k

Expand full comment

It is so so horrifying it is hard to read about. The documentation you are doing takes nerves of steel.

Expand full comment

I'm working on my steel threads knitting! Another dead young person killed by this cult is Samuel Walter Cassidy, took name Thea, Theadora in freshman year of college. Appears in later photos to be on estrogen. If he also took finasteride to reduce hair loss, there's the connection with his suicide. The method was carbon monoxide poisoning in a car, in a garage in Millerton, PA. He was born in 2005, dead by 2023. Gripping photos can be found by search under Theadora Cassidy, funeral home. The cult will count this as a suicide due to "transphobia" but if finasteride is one of the meds, this drug is already directly related to many suicides. Sam appeared in a photo with a girl in a Wellesley shirt, and I wonder if he went to school there? Anyone with more info can use the contact form at uteheggengrasswidow.wordpress.com

Expand full comment

“It’s as if their loyalty is to the transition interventions and not to the long-term health and well-being of transgender-identified young people.”

The Trans cult's loyalty is to itself and to its sacred dogma—more or less the undefinable concept of "Gender", which is almost entirely a form of metaphysical gnosticism, where a gendered spirit supplants physical reality—and as we've seen with prior cult movements and especially with Marxism (one of Gender Theory's intellectual parents), zealots, theorists and other true believers would rather kill or die than admit that their god had failed. And this denial mechanism is even stronger in this case, as admitting error means admitting to the unnecessary mutilation of thousands of children.

To paraphrase another Left theorist, Uncle Joe Stalin: “The mutilation of one child is a tragedy. The mutilation of a many thousands is a statistic.”

Expand full comment

Exactly. Medicine’s goal should be to help people achieve their best possible health and happiness. Even in areas where care is straightforward and not controversial (someone with sepsis from pneumonia should receive fluids and antibiotics) there’s still plenty of debate and inquiry into question about which antibiotics are best, how much to give, what type of fluid is best, how much is too much? There’s so many details for different patients that need to be considered and assumptions to be questioned. There’s plenty of areas where there’s no right answer, and it’s a process of figuring out what’s right for individual patients (neck pain from a herniated disk) some patients get better with PT, some need surgery but that comes with a lot of risk, so there’s always ongoing discussions with the patient, the doctors, and the most up to date research about risks and benefits about different routes. The goal is always the same: how can we help this patient get well with the least amount of risk? Some patients feel much better after neck surgery, but some have complications so it’s important to see if the patient can get better with milder interventions first. If we suddenly created some insane religion about the human right to neck surgery, we would see tons of unnecessary harm with much less benefit. It would be insane to call physical therapists “neckphobes” because they advocate for a conservative attempt to relieve pain before considering surgery. If we suddenly saw a 4000% increase in teen girls complaining of neck pain in clusters of friend groups we wouldn’t say they have the right to get surgery. We certainly wouldn’t advocate in schools that children should really think about their neck hurting to consider if they want surgery as a teenager. It would be wild in that climate to say “we have studies in adult men that show that when they said they had neck pain, many had improvements in their pain!” as justification for allowing people to get neck surgery whenever they want.

We treat this condition of gender dysphoria as if it’s some special category that deserves unique rules for the way we practice medicine, but it’s absolutely not. People with neck pain deserve the best possible information that relates to their specific condition to be able to determine which steps to take and the real risks and benefits involved. It’s absolutely the same for people with gender dysphoria. We need the field of gender to be neutral and open to a wide variety of treatment options (exploratory therapy, watch and wait with treatment of underlying conditions, the current medical model) with discussions with patients and parents about what the evidence does and doesn’t know about risks and benefits of each intervention.

Expand full comment

Good summary, but I must disagree with one idea.

“Personally, I don’t think the claim that puberty blockers are reversible is definitively false”

“Reversible” is a term which doesn’t apply to an alteration of a process like puberty, menopause, or senescence, which irreversibly progresses over time at a rate which cannot be accelerated.

It’s not propofol, or a medically induced coma, or stopping a heart for surgery.

Ask who coined the term “reversible”, and for whom. It is only to be used in cases of “precocious puberty”, where it is “reversible” like anesthesia.

I think the root problem is that “precocious puberty” is a euphemism: the condition is not puberty it is precocious sex hormone production. If it were precocious “puberty” the child would also be growing and exhibiting all other classic signs of puberty. Sex hormone production is not the same as puberty, or we could say all adults are in perpetual puberty until menopause or death. That’s not the case.

I know the claim that puberty blockers are reversible is false.

Expand full comment

Recalling Dr. William Ayres the former President of the American Academy of Child Psychiatrists I wonder if many male pediatricians are pedophiles. Note Donald Allen and Melvin Levine of Boston children's Hospital among others. All seem to have been tolerated or coveted-up for like Earl Bradley whose colleagues would joke that if you took your baby girl to Dr Bradley for an ear exam he'd give her a free vaginal examination.

Expand full comment

I had one as a little girl. Eventually barred from practice but not even a famous case.

Expand full comment

Our children’s pediatrician was caught with a twelve year old Boy Scout that was in his troop. Left town rather quickly.

Expand full comment

Benjamin,

Thank you for this excellent article as well as all your posts on X. In particular I appreciate you acknowledging the amazing Dr. Lisa Littman -- I vividly remember how Brown University dismissed her and how she was attached for the concept of "Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria."

Expand full comment

Whether or not the science is settled, this young woman is still dead because the entire medical enterprise supported the confused thinking of a girl who was only 13 years old: https://lucyleader.substack.com/p/rip-griffin-sivret

Expand full comment

To be clear Dr. Johanna is reportedly a tim xy aka male - so the correct pronouns are HE/HIM, not she/her…

Expand full comment

I've seen that allegation, but no evidence so far.

Expand full comment

If it looks like a cult and behaves like a cult, it probably is a cult... It's a cult.

Expand full comment

I have to shake my head when I read about this field of ‘medicine’. Are these people so arrogant that they think they can make a little girl happy by affirming that you’re really a little boy. We need law suits, lots and lots of law suits.

Expand full comment

If it looks like a cult and behaves like a cult, it probably is a cult... It's a cult.

Expand full comment

May this note find us all ever closer to God, and His Peace.

.

Insanity. Do we need a law that punish anyone that; pierces, tattoos, FGM, MGM, .., including any drugs that effect normal development, so at 15-years old the people get the best body as possible?

.

Such child-abuse pedophiles sexually mutilating physically and mentally! Fatherlessness, abusive twisted mothers, 'devouring mothers', men driven out of child education where delusional psycho baby-killing [supporting] mind-raping education system and all 'Professionals', ..!

.

Accepting Insanity - raised from crip to be mentally cripped, unable to think clearly - especially on all aspects that touch on sex (and what doesn't?)

Abortion and Western-wide World-wide Darkened Intelect and damage to intellectual mental faculties.

As a young man at University I took a medical ethics course where essays on Abortion debate were considered and discussed, yet no argument against abortion presented in course or I ever heard were anything as decisive as the one argument inspired to me after learning some Traditional Catholic Theology, St. Thomas Aquinas' break-down of mental faculties and the damage we induce to Sin, the Darkening of Intelect.

This argument avoids the baby-killed and all the Secular Satanic distractions of when after conception is it wrong to kill them, their rejection of the Truth of Conception as Holy Significant Truth of Life.

The argument is further shown true by the continued increased state of insanity, Sin, Sicken souls, Sicken Church, ... anyone my age or older (and many younger) can verify in personal experience and memories of this rapid and increasing drop down Jaccob's Ladder deeper into Hell.

The Argument simply brings Clarity of the damage done to us all when from our crib we are indoctrinated to believe the clearly insane - that it is acceptable that mothers may kill our babies, siblings, grandchildren, .. on their whims. That belief is socially, legally, Sick womanhood, and others re-enforced and to object from crib is punished in often psychological damaging ways by them and our mothers.

If our intellect and judgement is so damaged and weakened to believe this insane thing is acceptable, what cannot also be made acceptable - sterilizing or sexually mutilating children? Sex is changeable. Open televised Genocide is okay?

Of course, the damage to womanhood is significant. If she believes she may kill her baby, the dehumanizing of self and others into inconvenient group of cells has been done, and she with that Power of Murder, why not False-Accuse, or other self, others, society damaging Sins would she consider less-then murdering babies so acceptable to do?

.

We throughout the West are so harmed and mind-crippled that many should be supervise for own good, and fatherless children need protection from our delusional psycho insane mothers and women professional.

.

God Bless., Steve

Expand full comment